Share: 
Economic activity moderates in Q2Economic activity moderates in Q2Economic activity moderates in Q2Economic activity moderates in Q2Economic activity moderates in Q2Economic activity moderates in Q2Economic activity moderates in Q2Economic activity moderates in Q2Economic activity moderates in Q2Economic activity moderates in Q2Economic activity moderates in Q2

Slight deterioration of the global macroeconomic scenario. On the one hand, the Q1 growth data for some of the major emerging economies (India, Brazil and Turkey) proved somewhat worse than expected, leading us to slightly reduce our growth forecast for 2019 (from 3.3% to 3.2%) and confirming that the global economy will shift down a gear this year (considering that in 2018 growth stood at 3.6%). On the other hand, we have seen a significant deterioration in the global sentiment indicators in Q2: the global PMI composite indicator fell to 51.2 points in May (52.1 in April), while the manufacturing index stood below 50 points (the threshold that separates the expansive and recessive territories). Thus, the data indicate that global economic activity has embarked on a somewhat weaker path, affected by greater global uncertainty.

Heightened uncertainties. One of the main reasons we assign a greater likelihood of the downside risks materialising is the fact that the protectionist tensions between the US and China reappeared in May and, as suggested by all the indicators, this time are here to stay. As such, the global economy remains on high alert, as demonstrated by the spike in the geopolitical risk indices. This is despite the tempering of the situation in the short term, as trade negotiations resumed following the meeting between Trump and Xi Jinping at the G-20 summit in Osaka in late June. Therefore, although some form of agreement between the two powers can be expected, it is unlikely to be an ambitious one. In addition, there are two reasons that reinforce the view that uncertainty has come to stay. Firstly, there is a significant risk that, in the end, no such agreement will be reached: underlying disagreements remain unresolved and China has published a white paper in which it rejects having taken advantage of forced technology transfers, one of the key points of the litigation. The second reason is that, even if an agreement is reached, uncertainty will not fade overnight: the tariffs imposed are unlikely to be withdrawn immediately and, in a conflict as complex and with so many edges as this one, some latent pockets of uncertainty will persist. If these risks materialise, the slowdown could prove much more abrupt than we expect, largely due to the indirect effects of heightened uncertainty. In particular, both China and the US would pay a heavy toll in terms of growth (for exact figures, see the Focus «The threat of protectionism in the global economy» in this same Monthly Report).

In Europe, political uncertainty rises once again. On the one hand, if the Italian government fails to present a credible fiscal plan in July, the European Commission is likely to recommend to the European Council to impose an excessive deficit procedure (EDP) on the country. This would oblige the Italian cabinet to include adequate adjustment measures in its budget for 2020, which is to be presented by mid-October 2019, in order to streamline the national accounts but without harming economic growth, which is already scarce. The negotiations between Rome and Brussels will be drawn out (the EDP is essentially a gradual, political process which offers a lot of leeway for affected countries to take corrective measures), but the tensions are likely to gain prominence over the coming months. Furthermore, the Italian government still has the option to call new elections at the end of the year, which could lengthen the whole process and intensify the conflict. In the United Kingdom, the situation is not looking much brighter: Boris Johnson is emerging as the favourite to become the new Prime Minister and, although the difficulties that the British Parliament is experiencing to agree on an exit strategy should pave the way for another extension to Article 50 at the end of October, his statements reiterating the commitment to leave the EU in October highlight the risk of a no-deal Brexit.

Economic activity moderates in Q2. Following a higher than expected GDP in Q1 (0.4% quarter-on-quarter), reflecting the resilience of domestic demand, recent indicators suggest that in the second quarter the euro area economy will have grown at a more moderate rate (0.2%-0.3% quarter-on-quarter) and that it will be more in line with the slowdown that we witnessed in the second half of last year. The decoupling between a service sector that remains buoyant, thanks to the endurance of domestic demand, and an industrial sector that is suffering the effects of global uncertainty and the slowdown in trade flows was once again reflected in the Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI): in June, the services PMI rose, while the manufacturing index remained stranded in recessive territory (47.8 points). The ECB’s own forecasts, which in its June update point towards a growth projection for 2019 of 1.2% (a figure similar to our forecast of 1.3%), reflect the expectation of moderate growth. In part, this is the result of a more adverse global environment that is penalising foreign demand. Therefore, both a subsiding of the protectionist tensions and the dissipation of the factors that have adversely affected the automotive sector could give euro area growth some more traction. Inflation, meanwhile, remains at modest levels, standing at 1.2% in both May and June, after the seasonal effects that had temporarily boosted it in April due to Easter subsided.

Germany fails to pull out of the rut. The importance of the foreign sector for the German economy (in 2018, German exports of goods and services accounted for 47% of GDP, compared to just 34% in Spain, for example) explains why it is being particularly affected by the uncertainty and the slowdown in the global economy. The industrial sector, which is highly reliant on exports, is experiencing widespread adverse effects far beyond those experienced by the automotive sector, as reflected in the industrial production figures for April (–1.9% year-on-year). In addition, the Bundesbank stated in its June update that it expects GDP to contract slightly in Q2. All this has led us to revise Germany’s growth forecasts for 2019 and 2020 down by –0.2 pps, to 0.8% and 1.4%, respectively.

Portugal proves resilient in a demanding global environment

Economic activity grows at a steady pace. In May, the coincident economic activity indicator developed by the Bank of Portugal (which has a strong correlation with GDP) stood at 2.1%. This follows the figure of 2.0% registered in April and points towards economic activity growth of around 2% in Q2 2019 (i.e. very much in line with GDP growth of 1.8% in the first quarter of the year). In terms of components, domestic demand remains the main driver of growth, as is clearly reflected in most of the indicators. For example, in addition to the encouraging labour market data discussed below, the coincident indicator for household consumption also stood at 2.1% in May (in line with the figure for April and the average for Q1 2019), while the synthetic indicator for investment accelerated at the beginning of the second quarter. The Bank of Portugal itself highlighted the strength of domestic demand, and of investment in particular, in its Economic Bulletin of June. In this Bulletin, it presented an update of its economic forecasts (GDP growth of 1.7% in 2019 and of 1.6% for 2020-2021), which is consistent with the scenario forecast by CaixaBank Research. However, some sentiment indicators suggest a more cautious performance of industry, trade and construction over the coming quarters (for instance, the confidence index for industry has declined to –3.3 points for the average for Q2 2019, versus the –1.4 points registered in Q1). These indices also point out that the Portuguese economy is operating in a more adverse external environment.

The external financing needs reached 0.2% of GDP in Q1 2019 (4-quarter cumulative balance). This represents a deterioration of 1.3 pps compared to the net lending capacity of Q1 2018 (+1.1% of GDP) and reflects differing behaviour among sectors. On the one hand, the public sector stood out as having performed particularly well, with external borrowing needs that fell to 0.1% of GDP (–0.6 pps compared to Q1 2018). This was largely thanks to the reduction in financing costs and the increased tax revenues (boosted in turn by the strong performance of the labour market). On the other hand, the external borrowing needs of non-financial corporations and the net lending capacity of households deteriorated substantially. In particular, the borrowing of non-financial corporations is being held back by the strong recovery of investment and stood at 2.4% of GDP (+1.6 pps). The net lending capacity of households, meanwhile, decreased to 0.4% (–0.4 pps), in a context in which the household savings rate remains at almost minimum levels (4.5% in the March 2019).

The deterioration in the current account balance eased in April, when the current account deficit stood at 1.0% of GDP (12-month cumulative balance). This figure represents a slight improvement over March (1.2%), thanks to the moderation in the income balance deficit (which fell from 1.6% in March to 1.2% in April). Meanwhile, the balance of services maintained a surplus of 8.2% and the deficit in the balance of goods increased to 8.0% (7.8% in March). The deterioration in the current account balance so far this year is mainly due to the combination of slower growth in exports (in a more adverse external environment) and greater investment in machinery and transport equipment (with the resulting knock-on effect on imports). This trend is likely to persist over the coming quarters (we anticipate a current account deficit of around 1.8% for 2019 as a whole).

The labour market shows a positive performance. In May, the unemployment rate remained at 6.6% (in seasonally adjusted terms), the same figure as in April and –0.5 pps below that of May 2018. The population in employment, meanwhile, continued to rise (0.8% year-on-year), albeit much more moderately than in the past (2.5% in May 2018 and 2.3% on average in 2018). This moderation suggests that, after several years of recovery, the labour market is entering a more mature phase, as well as being in line with the economy’s convergence towards more moderate growth rates. Similarly, job offers received by the Institute for Employment and Vocational Training (known as the IEFP in Portuguese) stood at slightly below 18,000 in May (12-month moving average), which represents a reduction of some 3,000 offers compared to the figure for May 2018.

The real estate market remains buoyant. In Q1 2019, the price of housing rose by a solid 9.2% year-on-year, only 1 decimal point below the rate observed in Q4 2018. This slight moderation was due to the slowdown in the growth rate of new housing prices (6.0% in Q1 2019, compared to 8.5% in Q4 2018), since the prices of second-hand homes accelerated (10.0% versus 9.5%). Housing construction, meanwhile, continued to recover and in Q1 2019 around 3,000 new homes were completed (+8.4% year-on-year). This is still a considerable growth rate (despite the significant moderation compared to previous quarters, when growth rates of over 20% were recorded). Furthermore, coupled with the increase in construction permits granted (+16.5% year-on-year in the first four months of 2019), this will facilitate the narrowing of the gap between supply and demand for housing and will contribute to curbing price growth.

New lending transactions increased by 0.4% in the first four months of the year. Yet, this figure is strongly affected by the fall in new loans to firms and, in particular, due to a base effect related to a very large lending transaction carried out in January 2018. Correcting for this effect, total new lending would have grown by 5.5% year on year. In the case of households, new lending transactions for housing slowed in the first four months as a whole (5.6% year-on-year, compared to 19.6% in 2018) and fell in the case of consumer credit (–2.9%, versus +9,3% in 2018). The Bank of Portugal, meanwhile, gave a positive assessment of credit institutions’ compliance with the macroprudential recommendations that had come into force in July 2018 with the aim of promoting financial stability.

Share: